Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using induction heat (IH) treatment to locally transform one half of a steel brace section to high-strength steel section as well as inducing intentional eccentricity along the brace length has been experimentally proven to increase the limited post-yielding stiffness exhibited by conventional steel braces. This paper develops a multi-level seismic design method for intentionally eccentric IH-treated steel braced frames (IH-FIEB) to support their implementation in building structures. More specifically, experimental results on the cyclic behaviour of IH-treated steel braces with intentionally eccentricity (IH-BIEs) are presented giving an emphasis in quantifying member's resistance to local buckling and fracture initiation. A theoretical model is developed on the force-deformation relationship of the bracing system which is validated with test results and results obtained from a parametric finite element analysis study. On the basis of theoretical model, design expressions that describe the mechanical two-phase yielding behaviour of the bracing system controlled by the alternated flexural-axial behaviour are developed. The high post-yielding stiffness and controllability of the brace response through eccentricity provide the brace the capability of satisfying multiple strength performance objectives simultaneously. Time-history analysis results under three seismic hazard levels demonstrate that IH-FIEBs assure a more uniform overstrength and plastic engagement between each story than the conventional steel braced frames. IH-BIEs smoothly transition into post-buckling response and engage plastically at low drift demands, while seismic forces developed are well controlled and close to the values expected from the design procedure. A significant reduction of the residual deformation is observed at high seismic intensity levels indicating that IH-FIEBs may be able to reduce post-hazard damage compared to conventional braced frames.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Σκαλωμένος et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: