Compares skeletal stability and condylar resorption in mild craniofacial microsomia and non-syndromic Class II asymmetry, suggesting similar outcomes.
This study was performed to compare skeletal stability and condylar resorption after bimaxillary surgery between adults with mild craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and those with non-syndromic skeletal Class II asymmetry. Cone-beam computed tomography images of two groups were analysed: CFM group (n = 20), Class II group (n = 20). Voxel- and landmark-based methods were used to quantify the translation and rotation of osteotomy segments during surgery and at follow-up. Changes in condylar volume were measured at follow-up. Compared to the Class II group, the surgical movements were significantly larger in the CFM group for several parameters (P < 0.05). The maxilla demonstrated similarly good stability in the CFM group as in the Class II group, except at A-point (P = 0.024). Similarly good stability in mandibular projection was also observed in the CFM group. Regarding symmetry, less stability was found on the non-affected side of the mandibular body in the CFM group (sagittal, P = 0.038; vertical, P = 0.018) and in the anterior mandible in the Class II group (P = 0.56; clinically relevant). The CFM group showed significantly less condylar resorption on the affected side (P = 0.042). In conclusion, the stability of mild CFM was clinically good and not inferior to that of non-CFM Class II asymmetry, despite the greater surgical movements in CFM. Moreover, the hypoplastic condyles in CFM were not vulnerable to resorption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: