Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines cognitive deficits and emotional processing in acoustic schwannoma patients, indicating the need for thorough assessments.
= 44) was screened according to the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (2021) and recruited by consecutive sampling from a referral and tertiary care medical center in South India. Selected neuropsychological tests from the Post-Graduate Institute Battery of Brain Dysfunction, Wechsler Memory Scale III, and National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences Neuropsychology Battery were administered along with a task developed for the assessment of emotion processing. The data was statistically analyzed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) for descriptive analysis and non-parametric inferential statistics. The cohort had a mean age of 43.86 (±11.09) years, with a median of 12 (±3.02) years of education and right hemispheric (54.5%) cerebellar-pontine angle lesions. Our results demonstrate impairment in multiple neurocognitive domains, including visuospatial construction, visual/verbal memory, attention, executive functions, and difficulty in emotional processing in acoustic schwannoma patients, consistent with cerebellar contributions to higher-order functions. These deficits correlated with sociodemographic and clinical factors, potentially implicating networks such as the default mode network, cerebello-thalamo-cortical, and fronto-cerebellar pathways. The study highlights the need for comprehensive neuropsychological assessments in acoustic schwannomas and implications for functional outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nottamkandath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: