Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Perspective highlights the need for strong stewardship in implementing ethics of AI healthcare, addressing power imbalances.
The release of Generative AI and its availability to the general population was a game changer. Making Generative AI accessible to members of the public opened up knowledge that was previously guarded by experts. As a result, Generative AI is changing the relationship between AI, patient and clinicians. Ethics guidelines issued by governments lay out what should be considered when implementing AI-enabled healthcare. However, how these guidelines are implemented matters. This perspective reflects on the complexity of the task, and how to go about it. Systems Thinking is a well-suited discipline to the task of implementing AI-enabled healthcare and involves participatory processes. However, given the financial and epistemic power imbalance between the AI technology owners and its users, there is a need for strong stewardship of the process. First Nations of Australia cultural processes offer possible guidance about how to enact this stewardship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goirand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: