Shows lung ultrasound B-lines estimate left ventricular filling pressure, suggesting a non-invasive assessment alternative.
Background Direct measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) remains the gold standard for evaluating hemodynamic congestion, yet its invasive nature limits its use in daily clinical practice. Lung ultrasound (LUS) quantifies extravascular lung water through B-lines and could represent a non-invasive, bedside alternative. However, its direct correlation with invasively measured LVEDP has not been validated. Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of LUS-derived B-lines in estimating invasively measured LVEDP and to explore their relationship with echocardiographic and biomarker-based surrogates of left ventricular filling pressure. Methods In this prospective, single-centre study, consecutive adults undergoing left heart catheterization were assessed. Within 60 minutes post-procedure, a standardized 8-zone anterior LUS protocol was performed by trained operators blinded to hemodynamic data. The total B-line count was compared to invasively measured LVEDP. Correlations with echocardiographic parameters (E/e’, LVEF) and NT-proBNP were analyzed using Pearson’s coefficient and multivariate linear regression. Results Sixty-one patients were included (73% male, median age 59 years). Elevated LVEDP (≥18 mmHg) was present in 34%. Patients with elevated LVEDP exhibited a significantly higher B-line count (median 4 [0–18] vs. 0 [0–1], p = 0.002). B-lines strongly correlated with LVEDP (r = 0.64, p < 0.001), comparable to the correlation observed for E/e´ (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). LVEF inversely correlated with LVEDP (r = –0.53, p < 0.001), whereas NT-proBNP showed no significant relationship (r = 0.08, p = 0.88). In multivariate analysis, B-lines (β = 0.57, p = 0.001) and E/e´ (β = 0.78, p = 0.016) independently predicted elevated LVEDP. Conclusion B-line quantification by LUS provides a robust, non-invasive estimate of LVEDP, demonstrating strong agreement with direct intracavitary measurements. This translational approach bridges invasive hemodynamic monitoring and bedside assessment, enabling rapid, radiation-free evaluation of cardiac congestion. Incorporating LUS into clinical algorithms may enhance diagnostic precision and guide tailored therapy in acute and chronic heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Becerra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: