Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study evaluates HPV self-sampling acceptability in previously screened Turkish women, suggesting potential for improved screening participation.
Background: Cervical cancer remains a major public health problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where screening coverage is suboptimal. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling has emerged as a promising strategy to improve participation in cervical cancer screening programs. This study aimed to evaluate attitudes, preferences, and acceptability regarding HPV self-sampling among Turkish women. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Türkiye between January and June 2025. A total of 302 women aged 30–65 years who had previously undergone clinician-collected cervical sampling were included. Participants completed a structured questionnaire assessing their preferences, concerns, and attitudes toward HPV self-sampling. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 29. Results: Overall, 73.6% of participants supported the inclusion of HPV self-sampling in the national screening program. However, 49% preferred clinician-collected sampling, while 41.7% preferred self-sampling. Approximately 34.4% reported anxiety related to performing self-sampling. Higher educational level was significantly associated with increased acceptance (p = 0.002), whereas age was not significantly associated. Conclusions: HPV self-sampling appears to be an acceptable alternative among previously screened women and may help address certain barriers to participation. Further studies are needed to evaluate its real-world implementation and potential role in supporting participation in broader populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dağlı et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: