Assesses environmental and mechanical impacts of coarse crumb rubber in Colombian granular subbase, suggesting sustainable construction methods.
In the pursuit of sustainable solutions in construction, crumb rubber (CR) emerges as a viable alternative for enhancing road infrastructure projects. This study aims to assess the replacement of coarse crumb rubber (CCR) in a granular subbase with a maximum nominal size of 37.5 mm (known as GSB38), under Colombian conditions. The evaluated replacements of CCR were 10% and 15% by weight, and physical and mechanical tests were conducted to assess the impact of recycling on the behavior of GSB38. Additionally, to verify its sustainability as an alternative, a comparative environmental analysis was carried out between alternatives with CCR and 100% GSB38. The environmental analysis was modeled using the SimaPro tool, considering a cradle-to-gate approach. Furthermore, the assessment was conducted by applying CML-IA baseline V3.08 / EU25, which assesses 11 impacts. Savings of up to 9% were found in Acidification and Eutrophication impacts when using 10% CCR. Conversely, with 15% CCR, the maximum environmental savings observed were 5% in Eutrophication. Although the inclusion of CCR resulted in environmental improvements, it also led to a decline in mechanical performance, particularly in terms of CBR values. This reduction in strength renders the CCR alternatives unsuitable from a structural perspective. Nevertheless, from an environmental standpoint, the use of CCR represents a promising strategy for the management of rubber waste and contributes to the advancement of more sustainable construction practices, particularly in contexts where waste reuse policies are still under development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fontalvo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: