Examines performance balance in asphalt base courses using recycled materials, suggesting sustainable practices.
The global surge in construction and demolition waste (C&DW) has triggered severe environmental challenges, with infrastructure serving as the primary source, urgently requiring sustainable development through circular economy models. This study proposes a technical framework for asphalt pavement base-layer regeneration: synergistic utilization of 75% recycled concrete powder (RCP) as filler replacement and 0%–100% recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) as coarse aggregate replacement, with optimal performance achieved at 40%–60% RCA substitution rates to achieve high-value circulation of construction solid waste. Based on multiobjective optimization of technical–environmental–economic aspects, the study systematically evaluates performance, environmental, and economic benefits, and reveals RCP-RCA synergistic mechanisms and optimal trade-offs between performance and sustainability through multiscale analysis and life cycle assessment. Results show that when RCP is fixed, the RCA substitution rate correlates strongly linearly with asphalt-to-aggregate ratio; RCA incorporation significantly improves high-temperature and moisture sensitivity but reduces fatigue life, with performance degradation after exceeding the 60% critical substitution rate; compaction characteristics strongly positively correlate with high-temperature performance ( r = 0.928 ), and volumetric characteristics moderately correlate with low-temperature ductility ( r = 0.543 ); the coefficient of variation–technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (CVM-TOPSIS) model determines RCA40-60 as the optimal substitution scheme, significantly reducing net global warming potential (GWP) (16.82%–24.66%) and costs (6.84%–9.73%) while balancing performance; the constructed prediction model can evaluate service life under different traffic conditions, supporting sustainable pavement design decisions. This study provides a scientific basis for implementing a circular economy in road infrastructure, contributing to clean production in the construction industry and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: