Key result
Pre-ECMO congestion in patients requiring VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality (70.1% vs 41.6%; OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.52-29.24; p=0.012).
Why the study?
Congestive status among candidate patients to VA-ECMO support and its clinical impact during and after therapy are not well known.
Does pre-ECMO congestion predict in-hospital mortality in patients requiring VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock?
Cohort (n=65)
Does pre-ECMO congestion predict in-hospital mortality in patients requiring VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock?
Effect estimate: OR 6.7 (95% CI 1.52-29.24)
Absolute Event Rate: 70.1% vs 41.6%
p-value: p=0.012
Pre-ECMO congestion is a strong independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients requiring VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock, highlighting a high-risk phenotype that may benefit from early decongestive strategies.
Background Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used in patients with severe cardiogenic shock (CS) to reverse peripheral hypoperfusion and associated multiorgan failure. Congestive status among candidate patients to VA-ECMO support and its clinical impact during and after the therapy is not well known. Purpose To assess pre-cannulation congestion prevalence and its impact on in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing VA-ECMO for refractory CS. Methods This was a retrospective study, between January 2021 and August 2025, in which we consecutively enrolled 65 patients requiring VA-ECMO for medical CS and refractory cardiac arrest (ECPR). Pre-ECMO congestion was diagnosed based on radiographic evidence of pulmonary edema, elevated post capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) >18 mmHg or clinical signs of volume overload. Results The mean age was 54.7 ± 14.4 years, with 73.8 % (n=48) male participants. VA-ECMO was initiated due to cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in 61.5% (n=40). Left ventricle unloading was used in 47.7% (n=31), 74.2% (n=23) being IABP and 25.8% (n=8) being microaxial flow pump device. Overall mortality was 52.3% (n=34). Pre-ECMO congestion diagnosis was found in 36.9% (n=24) patients. Main demographic and clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. Patients with Pre-ECMO congestion required higher circulatory support to reach adequate organic perfusion, with increased needs of noradrenaline (mcg/kg/min) during the first 24 hours (0.6 ± 0.5 vs 0.3 ± 0.3; 0.014) and VA-ECMO support flow (l/minute) (3.5 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 0.8; p = 0.025). In the univariate analysis, Pre-ECMO congestion was associated with acute pulmonary edema at any moment of the support (45.8% vs 14.6 %; p = 0.006), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (29.2% vs 7.3%; p = 0.019) and overall mortality (70.1% vs 41.6%; p = 0.048). In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, sex, etiology of shock, and ECPR, Pre-ECMO congestion was independently associated with mortality (OR 6.7; [95% CI 1.52–29.24]; p = 0.012), together with ECPR (OR 11.23; [95% CI 2.12–59.35]; p = 0.004). (Figure 1) Conclusions Pre-ECMO congestion not only was found in a significant number of patients but also identified a high-risk phenotype of cardiogenic shock when requiring VA-ECMO, as it showed an independent association to overall in-hospital mortality. Early recognition and active decongestive strategies prior to cannulation may improve outcomes in this critically ill population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sesmilo et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Refractory cardiogenic shock requiring VA-ECMO (n=65). Pre-ECMO congestion vs. No pre-ECMO congestion was evaluated on Overall in-hospital mortality (OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.52-29.24, p=0.012). Pre-ECMO congestion in patients requiring VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality (70.1% vs 41.6%; OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.52-29.24; p=0.012).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: