PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics0 citations

Nutrition Interventions Improve Glycemic Control Among People With Type 2 Diabetes in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries. A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
ARAmerigo RossiZNZunera NasirACAurelina Carrión

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition interventions on glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Conducted a systematic review of literature from Pubmed, ProQuest, and Scopus.
  • Screened 6778 unique abstracts; included 37 publications detailing 38 interventions for data extraction.
  • Evaluated intervention effects on glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose levels.
  • Decreased glycated hemoglobin from 8.6% to 7.4% (Cohen's d = 1.0).
  • Reduced fasting glucose from 172 mg/dL to 135 mg/dL (Cohen's d = 1.3).
  • Intervention adherence was reported at 87 ± 15%.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The incidence of Type II diabetes (T2D) is increasing rapidly in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Dedicated nutrition interventions may be a low‐cost low‐burden method to improve glycemic control. A systematic review was conducted to explore dedicated nutrition interventions in LMICs for people with T2D. Methods An intentionally broad search of Pubmed, ProQuest, and Scopus databases was conducted with multiple terms for diabetes, nutrition, and LMICs. The study authors screened 6778 unique abstracts for inclusion criteria. Following a thorough screening procedure, 37 publications reporting on 38 interventions were included for data extraction. Results The interventions were conducted in the Middle East and North Africa ( n = 14), Southeast Asia ( n = 7) and East Asia ( n = 7), Africa ( n = 5), South Asia ( n = 3), and Latin and South America ( n = 2), including a total of 2950 participants (55% women). Intervention duration was highly varied (18 ± 13 weeks), and led to a decrease in glycated hemoglobin (8.6% to 7.4%, Cohen's d = 1.0) and fasting glucose (172 to 135 mg/dL, Cohen's d = 1.3) in most studies. Intervention adherence was 87 ± 15%; parameters such as session duration, intensity, mode, setting, and study reporting varied greatly between trials and were often incompletely reported. Conclusion Nutrition interventions in LMICs show great potential for improving glycemic control among people with T2D, although little research has been conducted in low‐income countries. More research should be conducted with standardized reporting procedures to develop and test evidence‐based strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rossi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0567a8a550a87e60a1fda0https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70269
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper