Key result
Machine learning using school muscular fitness tests and anthropometry predicts adolescent CV risk with ~0.72 AUC.
Why the study?
Can machine learning models built from school-based muscular fitness tests and basic anthropometry accurately predict cardiovascular risk in adolescents?
Observational
Can machine learning models built from school-based muscular fitness tests and basic anthropometry accurately predict cardiovascular risk in adolescents?
Effect estimate: AUC-ROC 0.716
Machine learning models using simple school-based muscular fitness tests can feasibly identify adolescents at cardiovascular risk, offering a low-cost strategy for early targeted interventions.
May support school-based cardiovascular risk screening in adolescents; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
) cut-points. Data were standardised, class imbalance was addressed using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling TEchnique (SMOTE), and eight supervised classifiers were trained with stratified five-fold cross-validation and grid search. Ensemble tree-based methods outperformed kernel-based models. Gradient Boosting achieved the best balance between predictive performance (area under the curve-receiver operating curve [AUC-ROC] 0.716, F1-score 0.857, recall 0.760, accuracy 0.755), followed by Random Forest. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses indicated that muscular fitness measures, particularly push-ups, sit-ups and standing long jump, contributed most to risk classification, whereas anthropometric indicators showed lower importance. These findings suggest that machine learning models built from school-based muscular fitness tests and basic anthropometry can discriminate adolescents at cardiovascular risk due to low cardiorespiratory fitness, offering a feasible, low-cost strategy to support early identification and targeted physical activity interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yáñez‐Sepúlveda et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk. Machine learning models (Gradient Boosting) vs. Kernel-based models was evaluated on Predictive performance for cardiovascular risk classification (AUC-ROC 0.716). Gradient Boosting machine learning models using school-based muscular fitness tests and basic anthropometry discriminated adolescents at cardiovascular risk with an AUC-ROC of 0.716.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: