Key result
Functional ventilatory profiling linked to gains in watts at ventilatory thresholds over 48 weeks.
Why the study?
Existing published markers did not describe recurrent patterns bridging static capacity and dynamic ventilatory use.
Presents a novel interpretive framework of proprietary ventilatory indices to bridge static capacity and dynamic use in elite athletes.
Emphasizes ventilatory metrics for threshold gains in athletes; leaves open prospective validation of this framework.
This article is not a literature review on ventilatory physiology. It presents an interpretive framework I have developed over six years of repeated measurements — around 80 WorldTour and ProTeam athletes profiled, twenty in longitudinal VST monitoring, hundreds of monitorings per year. The proprietary indices I present — ICIF, IMD, ECFI, IPV — did not emerge from theoretical intuition. They emerged from recurrent patterns that published markers did not describe. The article positions them as bridges between static capacity and dynamic use, to be read in pairs within a framework of discriminants. And it explains why this measurement architecture is inseparable from the VST project — the ventilatory driver that produces, on the 48-week cohort, the bulk of the gain in watts at ventilatory thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cyril Ricci (2026) studied Athletic performance (n=80). Functional Ventilatory Profiling (VST monitoring) was evaluated on Gain in watts at ventilatory thresholds. Functional ventilatory profiling using proprietary indices (ICIF, IMD, ECFI, IPV) provides an interpretive framework that produces gains in watts at ventilatory thresholds over a 48-week cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: