Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study predicts flow stress behavior in Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy, indicating model effectiveness.
The flow stress behavior of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy during thermo-mechanical processing is predicted by constitutive material modeling. To develop constitutive models of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy, isothermal uniaxial compression tests are performed under the different deformation conditions of 930–1050°C and 0.001–10 s–1. Using the experimental flow stress data, new versions of the modified Zerilli–Armstrong model, the strain-compensated Arrhenius-type model and modified Johnson–Cook model are constructed in the α + β two phase and β phase fields, respectively. The determination coefficient and average absolute relative error of the proposed version of modified Zerilli–Armstrong model are 0.9917 and 5.95%, respectively. Meanwhile, the modified Johnson–Cook model records the determination coefficient of 0.9907 and average absolute relative error of 7.53%, and the strain-compensated Arrhenius-type model records 0.9873 and 7.39%. This indicates that the phenomenologically modified Zerilli–Armstrong model is more appropriate than the strain-compensated Arrhenius-type model and modified Johnson–Cook model for predicting the high-temperature flow stress behavior of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: