Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial measures acoustic propagation to analyze temperature variability in Arctic waters, suggesting implications for climate studies.
The 2019–2020 US–Norwegian Coordinated Arctic Acoustic Thermometry Experiment (CAATEX) measured acoustic propagation at various ranges along a path extending from north of Svalbard to north of Alaska to study gyre and basin-scale temperature variability. Six moorings were installed in CAATEX. Two had broadband sources with a center frequency of 35 Hz. All moorings had vertical receiving arrays, enabling the spatial separation of the low-order acoustic normal modes. The modal group delays measured during CAATEX varied significantly over the year but were roughly consistent with predictions made using sound-speed fields for the decade 2015–2022 derived from the World Ocean Atlas 2023 (WOA 2023). The CAATEX mooring locations were chosen such that the signals traversed nearly the same trans-Arctic acoustic path as the signals in the 1994 Transarctic Acoustic Propagation (TAP) experiment. TAP mode-2 travel times were shorter than computed from the climatology available at the time, implying warming of the Atlantic Water. The uncertainty in the mode-2 travel time is sufficiently large, however, that it is consistent with travel times across all decades available in WOA 2023, which show little to no warming. The TAP mode-2 travel-time uncertainty and the CAATEX travel-time variability preclude definitive comparisons between the experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dzieciuch et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: