Randomized trial explores adjustments to standing criteria for the ECJ, suggesting implications for governance.
Medel v Council is a perfect opportunity to tweak standing requirements for the ECJ. If the ECJ, however, chooses to maintain its tight grip on standing, it risks is own position as interlocutor in the legal dialogue on such important issues as the rule of law or climate crisis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon M. Mauer (2026) studied this question.