Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective study links elevated soluble P-selectin levels to increased cardiovascular risk in healthy women, suggesting a potential biomarker for vascular risk assessment.
BACKGROUND: P-selectin, a cell-surface adhesion molecule involved in leukocyte rolling and attachment, has been hypothesized to play a role in the initiation of atherosclerosis. However, little clinical data are available evaluating the role of soluble P-selectin in determining vascular risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a large-scale prospective study of apparently healthy women, we measured baseline plasma concentration of soluble P-selectin among 115 participants who subsequently developed cardiovascular events and among 230 age- and smoking-matched participants who remained free of disease during 3.5 years of follow-up. Overall, mean levels of soluble P-selectin were significantly higher at baseline among women who subsequently experienced cardiovascular events compared with those who did not (83.2 versus 69.3 ng/mL; P:=0.003). The risk of future cardiovascular events increased with increasing quartiles of soluble P-selectin (P:=0.02), such that women in the highest quartile at study entry had an age- and smoking-matched relative risk 2.2 times higher than those in the lowest quartile (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.2; P:=0.01). This effect was independent of traditional risk factors. For each quartile increase in soluble P-selectin, the risk of future cardiovascular events increased 28% (P:=0.03) after additional adjustment for obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and exercise frequency. The highest risks were observed among women with the very highest levels of P-selectin (>137.3 ng/mL, the 95th percentile cut point of the control distribution). CONCLUSIONS: Soluble P-selectin levels are elevated among apparently healthy women at risk for future vascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ridker et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: