Key result
Paclitaxel-coated balloons reduce 1-year target lesion failure ~45% vs. uncoated balloons in multilayer ISR.
Why the study?
Does a low-dose paclitaxel-coated balloon reduce 1-year target lesion failure in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis compared to an uncoated balloon?
RCT
2:1
Yes
Does a low-dose paclitaxel-coated balloon reduce 1-year target lesion failure in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis compared to an uncoated balloon?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon significantly reduces 1-year target lesion failure compared to an uncoated balloon in patients with multilayer coronary in-stent restenosis.
BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) within multiple layers of stent pose a specific clinical challenge because of higher rates of recurrent restenosis as well as a desire to avoid an additional layer of stent. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide an alternative antiproliferative therapeutic option for multilayer ISR. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a low-dose paclitaxel-coated vs uncoated balloon among patients with multilayer or single-layer ISR in the AGENT IDE (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis) trial. METHODS: AGENT IDE is a prospective, multicenter trial that randomized patients with ISR (reference vessel diameter >2.0 mm to ≤4.0 mm and lesion length <26 mm) in a 2:1 allocation to paclitaxel-coated or an uncoated balloon following successful lesion preparation. Randomization was stratified by multi- vs single-layer ISR as well as by center. The primary study endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF): composite occurrence of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or cardiac death. Among patients with multilayer ISR, TLF was lower with paclitaxel-coated balloon compared with an uncoated balloon (23.8% vs 40.0%; HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), driven by reductions in both TLR and target vessel-related MI. Similar findings were observed among patients with single layer ISR (1-year TLF: 13.5% with paclitaxel-coated vs 20.2% with uncoated balloon; HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.37-1.11; P = 0.11), although absolute event rates were lower. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ISR of multiple stent layers had higher rates of adverse stent-related events compared with patients with single-layer ISR. Treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon led to greater absolute risk reduction in 1-year TLF among patients with multilayer ISR compared with an uncoated balloon. (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis [ISR] [AGENT IDE]; NCT04647253).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirtane et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). paclitaxel-coated balloon vs. uncoated balloon was evaluated on 1-year target lesion failure (TLF): composite occurrence of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or cardiac death (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.87, p=0.01). Among patients with multilayer in-stent restenosis, a paclitaxel-coated balloon reduced 1-year target lesion failure compared with an uncoated balloon.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: