Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates energy loss and efficiency in 2D Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite solar cells, suggesting improved designs for better performance.
Abstract 2D Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites (RPPs) are emerging as potential challengers to their 3D counterpart due to superior stability and competitive efficiency. However, the fundamental questions on energetics of the 2D RPPs are not well understood. Here, the energetics at (PEA) 2 (MA) n −1 Pb n I 3 n +1 /[6,6]‐phenyl‐C61‐butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) interfaces with varying n values of 1, 3, 5, 40, and ∞ are systematically investigated. It is found that n–n junctions form at the 2D RPP interfaces ( n = 3, 5, and 40), instead of p–n junctions in the pure 2D and 3D scenarios ( n = 1 and ∞). The potential gradient across phenethylammonium iodide ligands that significantly decreases surface work function, promotes separation of the photogenerated charge carriers with electron transferring from perovskite crystal to ligand at the interface, reducing charge recombination, which contributes to the smallest energy loss and the highest open‐circuit voltage ( V oc ) in the perovskite solar cells (PSCs) based on the 2D RPP ( n = 5)/PCBM. The mechanism is further verified by inserting a thin 2D RPP capping layer between pure 3D perovskite and PCBM in PSCs, causing the V oc to evidently increase by 94 mV. Capacitance–voltage measurements with Mott–Schottky analysis demonstrate that such V oc improvement is attributed to the enhanced potential at the interface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: