Why the study?
Does minimally invasive surgical ablation improve freedom from left atrial arrhythmia compared to catheter ablation in patients with antiarrhythmic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation?
Population
124 patients with antiarrhythmic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation with left atrial dilatation and…
Comparison
Minimally invasive surgical ablation consisting… vs Catheter ablation consisting of linear antral…
Design
RCT, Randomized to CA (63 patients) or SA (61 patients)
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
SA superior for rhythm control in refractory AF despite higher adverse events; extends RCT evidence for ablation modality selection.
Does minimally invasive surgical ablation improve freedom from left atrial arrhythmia compared to catheter ablation in patients with antiarrhythmic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation?
In patients with refractory atrial fibrillation, surgical ablation is superior to catheter ablation for maintaining sinus rhythm at 12 months, but is associated with a significantly higher rate of procedural adverse events.
Boersma et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: