Key result
Stress echocardiography and novel speckle-tracking techniques provide valuable non-invasive assessment of diastolic function.
Why the study?
Diastolic dysfunction is an important cause of exertional dyspnea, but echocardiographic images acquired at rest may be insensitive for detecting exertional abnormalities.
Stress echocardiography is a valuable noninvasive modality for assessing diastolic function and filling pressures during exertion, aiding in the diagnosis of HFpEF and other causes of exertional dyspnea.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diastolic dysfunction is an important, though often underappreciated, cause for exertional dyspnea. Echocardiography enables noninvasive evaluation of diastolic function and filling pressure, but images acquired at rest may be insensitive for detection of exertional abnormalities. This review focuses on stress echocardiography to assess diastolic function, including traditional and novel techniques, with emphasis on specific patient sub-groups in whom this testing may be valuable. RECENT FINDINGS: Emerging data informs patient selection for diastolic stress testing. Further, increasing literature provides considerations for performance and interpretation of diastolic metrics relevant to patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, athletes, and those with microvascular coronary dysfunction. Methods, such as speckle-tracking and multi-modality imaging, provide additional and complementary information for non-invasive diastolic assessment. This review serves as a guide to optimally utilize existing and novel techniques of stress echocardiography for diastolic assessment across a broad range of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laws et al. (2024) conducted a review in Diastolic dysfunction. Stress echocardiography was evaluated. Stress echocardiography, including traditional and novel techniques like speckle-tracking, provides valuable non-invasive assessment of diastolic function across various patient subgroups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: