Key result
Croatian version of CAMPHOR demonstrates excellent reliability and validity for clinical use.
Why the study?
Pulmonary hypertension severely impairs quality of life, and the CAMPHOR tool required adaptation and validation for use in Croatia.
Observational (n=50)
The Croatian version of the CAMPHOR is a valid and reliable disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life and symptoms in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Supports QoL assessment in Croatian PH patients; extends CAMPHOR validation but leaves open routine adoption pending prospective data.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a chronic disease which severely impairs quality of life (QoL). The Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) is the first disease-specific tool to assess patient-reported symptoms, functioning and QoL in PH patients. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the CAMPHOR for use in Croatia. The adaptation process involved three stages: translation (bilingual and lay panel), cognitive debriefing interviews with patients and psychometric validation. For the latter stage, a postal survey was conducted with 50 patients to examine the reliability and validity of the adapted scale. All three scales of the Croatian CAMPHOR demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Symptoms = 0.93; Activity limitations = 0.94; QoL = 0.92) and test-retest reliability correlations (Symptoms = 0.90; Activity limitations = 0.95; QoL = 0.90). Predicted correlations with the SF-36 scales provided evidence for construct validity of the CAMPHOR scales. Evidence for known group validity was shown by the ability of the scales to distinguish between participants based on patient-perceived general health and disease severity. The Croatian version of the CAMPHOR is a valid and reliable tool for use in clinical routine and clinical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ana Hečimović (2019) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension (n=50). Croatian version of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) was evaluated on Reliability and validity of the adapted scale. The Croatian version of the CAMPHOR demonstrated excellent internal consistency (0.92-0.94) and test-retest reliability (0.90-0.95), establishing it as a valid tool for clinical use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: