Comparing Classical and Machine Learning Force Fields for Modeling Deformation of Metal–Organic Frameworks Relevant for Direct Air Capture

O adsorption energies in a considerable fraction of MOFs promising for direct air capture (DAC). We then benchmark the efficacy of several general-purpose FFs in describing adsorbate-induced deformation for DAC against DFT. Our results show that current classical FFs are insufficient for describing MOF deformation, especially in cases of interest for DAC where strong interactions exist between adsorbed molecules and MOF frameworks. Some emerging machine learning force fields (MLFFs) we tested, particularly CHGNet, MACE-MP-0, and Equiformer V2, appear to be more promising than the classical FF for emulating the deformation behavior described by DFT. The best performing FF (CHGNet), however, fails to achieve the accuracy required for practical predictions with a mean absolute adsorption energy error of 0.124 eV.