Key result
FFR-guided deferral in infarct-related lesions post-MI yields similar 5-year TVF rates to non-infarct lesions.
Why the study?
Little evidence was available regarding the long-term safety of FFR-guided deferral of revascularization in infarct-related artery lesions, particularly when measuring FFR in the late phase post-MI.
Does FFR-guided deferral of revascularization in infarct-related artery lesions result in similar 5-year target vessel failure rates compared to non-infarct-related artery lesions in post-MI patients?
Cohort (n=1,263)
Yes
Does FFR-guided deferral of revascularization in infarct-related artery lesions result in similar 5-year target vessel failure rates compared to non-infarct-related artery lesions in post-MI patients?
p-value: p=.71
FFR-guided deferral of revascularization in infarct-related artery lesions in the late post-MI setting appears safe, with 5-year outcomes comparable to deferral in non-infarct-related artery lesions.
May support FFR-guided deferral in post-MI IRA lesions; extends observational data but leaves randomized confirmation open.
Background: Little evidence is available about the long-term safety of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization in infarct-related artery (IRA) lesions, especially when measuring FFR in the late setting after myocardial infarction (MI). This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes after deferral of revascularization in IRA lesions based on FFR assessed in the late phase of post-MI. Methods: From the J-CONFIRM registry (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), data on 1447 lesions (1263 patients) were divided into 2 groups: the IRA and non-IRA groups. The primary study end point was the cumulative 5-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), such as cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Results: = .71). Similar results were observed irrespective of regional wall motion assessed by ultrasonic cardiography and acute MI type. Conclusions: The 5-year TVF rate did not differ between the IRA and non-IRA lesions when deferring revascularization guided by FFR in the late setting of post-MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohashi et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Infarct-related artery lesions post-myocardial infarction (n=1,263). FFR-guided deferral of revascularization in infarct-related artery (IRA) lesions vs. FFR-guided deferral in non-IRA lesions was evaluated on Cumulative 5-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), such as cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (p=.71). FFR-guided deferral of revascularization in infarct-related artery lesions post-MI resulted in similar 5-year target vessel failure rates compared to non-infarct-related artery lesions (P=0.71).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: