Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The extent to which stomatal conductance ( g s ) was capable of responding to reduced hydraulic conductance ( k )and preventing cavitation‐inducing xylem pressures was evaluated in the small riparian tree, Betula occidentalis Hook. We decreased k by inducing xylem cavitation in shoots using an air‐injection technique. From 1 to 18 d after shoot injection we measured midday transpiration rate (E), g s , and xylem pressure (Ψ p‐xylem ) on individual leaves of the crown. We then harvested the shoot and made direct measurements of k from the trunk (2–3 cm diameter) to the distal tip of the petioles of the same leaves measured for E and g s . The k measurement was expressed per unit leaf area ( k l , leaf‐specific conductance). Leaves measured within 2 d of shoot injection showed reduced g s and E relative to non‐injected controls, and both parameters were strongly correlated with k l At this time, there was no difference in leaf Ψ p‐xylem between injected shoots and controls, and leaf Ψ p‐xylem was not significantly different from the highest cavitation‐inducing pressure (Ψ p‐cav ) in the branch xylem (‐1.43 ± 0.029 MPa, n=8). Leaves measured 7–18 d after shoots were injected exhibited a partial return of g s and E values to the control range. This was associated with a decrease in leaf Ψ p‐xylem below Ψ p‐cav and loss of foliage. The results suggest the stomata were incapable of long‐term regulation of E below control values and that reversion to higher E caused dieback via cavitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sperry et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: