Why the study?
Left atrial strain is a sensitive marker of early atrial dysfunction and left ventricular diastolic abnormalities in pediatric heart disease, yet its clinical integration remains limited.
Does left atrial strain assessment improve the detection of early atrial dysfunction and left ventricular diastolic abnormalities in pediatric heart disease?
Does left atrial strain assessment improve the detection of early atrial dysfunction and left ventricular diastolic abnormalities in pediatric heart disease?
Left atrial strain is a sensitive marker for early atrial and ventricular diastolic dysfunction in pediatric heart disease, but standardized protocols are needed for clinical integration.
Supports left atrial strain evaluation in pediatric heart disease; leaves open prospective validation and standardization before practice change.
Left atrial strain (LAS) is a sensitive marker of early atrial dysfunction and left ventricular diastolic abnormalities in pediatric heart disease, yet clinical integration remains limited. Evidence from 57 studies (2015-2024) including >5,300 patients <21 years of age demonstrates that healthy pediatric patients have higher LAS values, particularly left atrial conduit strain, than neonates and adults. Reduced left atrial reservoir and conduit strain is consistently reported in congenital heart disease and is associated with adverse outcomes across single-ventricle palliation stages. In pediatric cardiomyopathy, LAS impairment parallels worsening diastolic function. Among heart transplant recipients, left atrial reservoir strain correlates more strongly with invasive filling pressures than conventional noninvasive metrics. LAS also predicts myocardial injury in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, ischemic risk in diabetes, and early left ventricular dysfunction from chemotherapy. Despite its potential for diastolic function assessment, variability in acquisition and analysis remains substantial. Standardized protocols and larger prospective studies are needed to establish normative values and define clinical thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panatpur et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: