Key result
LAAO in CKD yields similar procedural success but non-CKD patients show ~57% lower total mortality.
Why the study?
The specific impact of chronic kidney disease on procedural success, complications, and outcomes of LAAO implantations remains underexplored.
Does chronic kidney disease impact the procedural success, complications, and clinical outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,576)
Does chronic kidney disease impact the procedural success, complications, and clinical outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion?
Effect estimate: OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.32-0.60)
LAAO implantation has comparable procedural success and stroke/bleeding outcomes in CKD versus non-CKD patients, though CKD patients have higher baseline risk and higher all-cause mortality.
LAAO shows comparable procedural success and safety in CKD; extends observational data but leaves mortality differences unadjusted for practice change.
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) experience atrial fibrillation more frequently. The balance of medical management for stroke prevention and bleeding events presents a challenging issue in CKD population. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may be an effective solution for stroke prevention in patients who experience frequent bleeding with oral anticoagulants. However, the specific impact of CKD on the procedural success, complications, and outcomes of LAAO implantations remains underexplored. METHODS: We conducted a search of various databases for articles published before October 31, 2023. This search yielded 7 studies, comparing outcomes between CKD and non-CKD cohorts undergoing LAAO implantation. Our analysis focused on CHA2DS2-VASc scores, average eGFR, use of oral anticoagulants, procedural success rates, procedural complications, and associated outcomes. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included data from 2576 patients, with 1131 identified as having CKD. The CKD group also had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (4.7 ± 1.4 vs 4.0 ± 1.5; P < .001) and HAS-BLED scores (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 3.1 ± 1.0; P < .001) than the non-CKD group. CKD patients showed a nonreduction in procedural success rates and a nonsignificant increase in total complications. The risks of stroke and transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, and cardiovascular mortality were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, a significantly lower rate of total mortality was observed in the non-CKD group (odds ratio: 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.60). CONCLUSION: While CKD is associated with a nonsignificant decrease in procedural success and a nonsignificant increase in complication risks, the outcomes of LAAO implantation are comparably favorable between CKD and non-CKD groups. Despite similar procedural outcomes, the CKD group exhibited a higher rate of all-cause mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation (n=2,576). Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in CKD patients vs. LAAO in non-CKD patients was evaluated on Total mortality (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32-0.60). LAAO in chronic kidney disease patients showed similar procedural success and complications to non-CKD patients, but non-CKD patients had lower total mortality (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.32-0.60).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: