Key result
Percutaneous non-valvular structural interventions require careful planning and accurate imaging to minimize complications.
Why the study?
Careful pre-procedural planning and accurate intra-procedural imaging are crucial to minimize procedural and device-related complications and improve patient outcomes in percutaneous non-valvular structural interventions.
Careful pre-procedural planning and accurate intra-procedural imaging are crucial to improve patient outcomes and minimize complications in non-valvular structural interventions.
Emphasizes planning and imaging to reduce complications; leaves open prospective validation across specific procedures.
Percutaneous non-valvular structural interventions, encompassing patent foramen ovale, atrial or ventricular septal defect closure and left atrial appendage closure, are usually performed in young and healthy patients and represent a valid alternative to pharmacological or surgical interventions. In order to minimize procedural and device related complications, a careful pre-procedural planning together with an accurate intra-procedural imaging are crucial to improve patient's outcome. In this article, we review currently available evidence on patient selection, procedural planning and interventional guidance helping physician to determine who will derive the most benefit from the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco et al. (2021) conducted a review in Non-valvular structural heart disease. Percutaneous non-valvular structural interventions was evaluated. Percutaneous non-valvular structural interventions require careful pre-procedural planning and accurate intra-procedural imaging to minimize complications and improve patient outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: