Key result
Non-fluoroscopic structural interventions achieve ~95% or higher procedural success rates across septal defect closures.
Why the study?
Structural heart interventions traditionally require invasive open-heart surgery or radiation-associated percutaneous approaches, prompting examination of percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic procedures.
Percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic procedures offer a feasible, radiation-free approach for structural heart interventions with high procedural success rates.
May support non-fluoroscopic ASD/PFO closure as radiation-free options; leaves open need for comparative trials.
Structural heart disease affects patients across all age groups and traditionally requires invasive open-heart surgery or percutaneous interventions with radiation exposure. Percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic (PAN) procedures enable non-thoracotomy, radiation-free treatment using echocardiographic guidance for structural heart interventions. This article examines the application of PAN procedures in atrial septal defect (ASD) closure, patent foramen ovale closure and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). The most robust evidence for the use of the PAN procedure is in ASD closure, with Chinese studies reporting procedural success rates improving from 92–96.5% in early studies to 98–100% in recent studies. International validation from German, Iranian and Indonesian centres and a meta-analysis of eight studies confirm consistent success rates of 94–100% across diverse healthcare settings. The PAN procedure in the patent foramen ovale closure shows promising feasibility, with success rates of 95–100% and manageable learning curves requiring approximately 50 cases for proficiency. The PAN procedure has reportedly achieved high procedural success for TEER in small samples, although its use for TEER requires further validation. As a radiation-free approach, the PAN procedure offers significant advantages, including eliminating radiation exposure, enhanced accessibility in resource-limited settings and potential cost reductions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2025) conducted a review in Structural heart disease (atrial septal defect, patent foramen ovale, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair). Percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic (PAN) procedures was evaluated on Procedural success rates. Percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic procedures demonstrated high procedural success rates for structural heart interventions, including 94-100% for ASD closure and 95-100% for PFO closure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: