Key result
Heart failure is linked to a ~29% lower Heart Rate Recovery Index, marking cardiovascular dysfunction.
Why the study?
The role of the Heart Rate Recovery Index in heart failure identification remained unexplored.
Does the Heart Rate Recovery Index differentiate heart failure status and phenotypes in patients undergoing exercise testing?
Observational (n=194)
Yes
Does the Heart Rate Recovery Index differentiate heart failure status and phenotypes in patients undergoing exercise testing?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.87% vs 2.65%
p-value: p=<0.01
The Heart Rate Recovery Index is a simple parameter derived from exercise testing that can distinguish heart failure status and differentiate across its phenotypes.
May aid heart failure phenotyping on exercise testing; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Purpose: Heart rate recovery, measured during exercise testing, is an important marker of cardiovascular function. The Heart Rate Recovery Index, a recently proposed parameter derived from heart rate recovery, has shown predictive outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. However, its role in heart failure identification remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess differences in the heart rate recovery index between patients with heart failure and individuals without heart failure undergoing exercise testing. Patients and Methods: 194 patients (mean age 58.3 ± 11.7 years; 57.7% men) with heart failure or other cardiovascular conditions requiring exercise testing were prospectively enrolled and underwent cycle ergometer testing. The index was calculated as the ratio between heart rate acceleration and deceleration time during exercise testing. Differentiation ability was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Subgroup and two-step cluster analyses examined heart rate recovery index differences across heart failure phenotypes and severity. Results: < 0.01). Cluster analysis identified four phenotypic groups, with the index helping to differentiate early or less severe from advanced heart failure, according to the ejection fraction. Conclusion: HRRI is a simple parameter that distinguishes the heart failure status and provides discrimination across its phenotypes. Its strong correlation with echocardiographic and functional markers supports its potential role in the assessment and characterization of heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dache et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=194). Heart Rate Recovery Index (HRRI) assessment vs. Individuals without heart failure was evaluated on Heart Rate Recovery Index (HRRI) (p=<0.01). The Heart Rate Recovery Index was significantly lower in patients with heart failure compared to those without (1.87 vs 2.65), demonstrating its utility as a non-invasive marker for cardiovascular dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: