Key result
Valve-in-valve TAVR with Acurate Neo 2 succeeds without early complications in 3 stentless bioprosthesis patients.
Why the study?
Stentless bioprosthetic valves lack visible posts and a stent frame, presenting unique procedural challenges during valve-in-valve TAVR.
Case Report (n=3)
Valve-in-valve TAVR using a self-expanding platform in failed stentless bioprosthetic valves appears feasible and safe with excellent 30-day outcomes.
Feasible in this small series; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a valid treatment option in symptomatic patients with failed aortic bioprosthetic valves, most especially in those with intermediate, high or prohibitive risk of surgery. Due to the unique design of stentless bioprosthetic valves with absence of visible posts and stent frame, they present with challenges during ViV TAVR procedure. Our case series assessed the safety, feasibility, and early outcomes of ViV TAVR in patients with failed bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) using self-expanding valve platform (Acurate Neo 2/AN2 valve) between March and September 2024 with minimalist approach. Procedural success, complications and early outcomes (mortality and functional status) were evaluated. A total number of three patients, mean age 75 ± 7 years, 67% female were included in the case series with high Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and European System of Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) score. The mean time from initial surgery to ViV procedure was 18 ± 1 years. ViV procedure was successfully completed in all patients with no major complication, and no more than trivial trans/paravalvular regurgitation on discharge. There was no requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation, no stroke or mortality at 30-day and there was significant improvement in functional class alongside symptomatic improvement. We report our experience in ViV TAVR using AN2 valve in Shelhigh supra stentless aortic bioprosthesis and that this procedure despite anatomical and procedural challenges is feasible and safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olusan et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Failed bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (n=3). Valve-in-valve TAVR using Acurate Neo 2 self-expanding valve was evaluated on Procedural success, complications and early outcomes (mortality and functional status). Valve-in-valve TAVR using the Acurate Neo 2 self-expanding valve in stentless bioprostheses was successfully completed in all 3 patients with no 30-day mortality, stroke, or major complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: