Key result
Higher weekly training volume strongly correlates with reduced sIL-6R levels in endurance athletes.
Why the study?
Does sIL-6R correlate with weekly training mileage and psychological well-being in highly trained endurance athletes?
Observational (n=29)
Does sIL-6R correlate with weekly training mileage and psychological well-being in highly trained endurance athletes?
Effect estimate: r=-0.74
p-value: p=<0.005
In highly trained endurance athletes, sIL-6R levels fluctuate with training volume and correlate with symptoms of overreaching such as stress and depressed mood.
sIL-6R may track training load and stress in endurance athletes; leaves open its value as an overreaching biomarker pending prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: Interleukin 6 (IL-6) has been ascribed both positive and negative roles in the context of exercise and training. The dichotomous nature of IL-6 signaling seems to be determined by the respective concentration of its receptors (both membrane-bound [IL-6R] and soluble [sIL-6R] forms). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the response of sIL-6R to long-term training and to investigate the relationship between sIL-6R, self-reported measures of well-being, and upper respiratory symptoms in highly trained endurance athletes. METHODS: Twenty-nine athletes provided resting blood samples and completed well-being and illness monitoring questionnaires on a weekly basis for a period of 18 wk during a winter training block. RESULTS: Upper respiratory symptoms were not correlated to concentrations of sIL-6R or cortisol, but there was a nonsignificant trend (P = 0.08) for the most illness-prone athletes (as defined by self-reported illness questionnaire data) to exhibit higher average sIL-6R concentrations compared with the least ill (23.7 ± 4.3 vs 20.1 ± 3.8 ng·mL). Concentrations of sIL-6R were positively correlated to subjective measures of stress (r = 0.64, P = 0.004) and mood (r = 0.49, P = 0.02) but were negatively correlated to sleep quality (r = -0.43, P = 0.05) and cortisol concentration (r = -0.17, P = 0.04). In a subgroup of 10 athletes, weekly training distance was quantified by coaching staff, and this negatively correlated with sIL-6R in the following week (r = -0.74, P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The findings of the current study suggest that sIL-6R is responsive to prolonged periods of exercise training, with sIL-6R levels varying related to the volume of training performed in the preceding week. Importantly, our data indicate that changes in sIL-6R levels could be linked to common symptoms of overreaching, such as high levels of stress, and/or depressed mood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cullen et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Healthy endurance-trained athletes (n=29). Prolonged exercise training was evaluated on Correlation between weekly training distance and sIL-6R concentration in the following week (r=-0.74, p=<0.005). In endurance athletes, circulating sIL-6R levels were negatively correlated with the volume of training performed in the preceding week (r=-0.74, P<0.005) and positively correlated with perceived stress.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: