Key result
Macroscopic blood viscosity changes determined by coaxial viscometry cannot quantitatively predict cerebral blood flow changes in cerebrovascular insufficiency or stroke.
Rheological phenomena such as red cell aggregation, deformability, and plasma viscosity are likely more important for cerebral microcirculation in stroke than macroscopic blood viscosity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Macroscopic viscosity measurements should not guide stroke management; leaves open the role of microcirculatory rheology in cerebral ischemia.
In summary, these considerations show that the hemodynamic role of blood rheology in cerebrovascular insufficiency or stroke is still not clear. However, the arguments and data presented allow some conclusions that are of practical and theoretical value in the process leading to further clarification: Changes of blood viscosity as determined by coaxial viscometry cannot be used to predict quantitatively the changes of cerebral blood flow occurring. It is likely that characteristic rheological phenomena such as red cell aggregation and deformability, plasma viscosity, and protein composition are more important for the rheological aspects of microcirculatory supply function than is reflected by their contribution to macroscopic viscosity of the blood. Further studies of blood rheology in stroke should therefore certainly include quantification of those rheological properties that are more closely related to the in vivo flow behavior of blood and thus the magnitude and distribution of flow in the cerebral microcirculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaehtgens et al. (1987) conducted a review in Cerebral ischemia and stroke. Macroscopic blood viscosity changes determined by coaxial viscometry cannot quantitatively predict cerebral blood flow changes in cerebrovascular insufficiency or stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: