The European Green Deal (EGD) in the public opinion – assessment of awareness of environmental pollution and threats to health and life

The main objective of this study is to assess the level of public awareness of environmental threats and their perceived impact on the health and lives of citizens, in the context of implementing the European Green Deal (EGD). The study focuses on analyzing the opinions of users of information on environmental pollution, its health effects, and the perceived opportunities and barriers related to implementing the EGD. Specific objectives include: (1) identifying public opinions on selected diseases related to environmental degradation; (2) assessing the perceived benefits and risks of implementing the EGD; and (3) analyzing the relationship between demographic characteristics and the level of acceptance for pro-environmental activities. The study is based on a survey method using a questionnaire, supplemented by a literature review. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to examine the significance of relationships between variables. The results indicate that respondents perceive a link between environmental pollution and diseases such as asthma, cancer, and lung disease. EGD is seen as an opportunity to improve environmental quality and public health, although implementation barriers such as cost, lack of public acceptance, and excessive regulation are also identified. This study contributes to our understanding of the role of public perception as a factor in the effectiveness of EU environmental policies. Key Findings of the article are : (1) Public Awareness: The study reveals that society is aware of the threats posed by environmental pollution to health and life. Diseases such as asthma, chronic lung diseases, and cancer are highlighted as major concerns ; (2) Strengths of the EGD: The EGD is seen as beneficial for providing stable electricity supply, improving the natural environment, reducing waste, and promoting clean production. It also emphasizes sustainable agriculture, circular economy, and creating new jobs ; (3) Weaknesses of the EGD: High implementation costs, lack of social acceptance, time-consuming political negotiations, and excessive regulations are identified as significant weaknesses. There are also concerns about the administrative costs and potential problems for small and densely populated countries in meeting EU requirements ; (4) Opportunities: The EGD presents opportunities for future generations to live in a better environment, advancements in therapeutic interventions, and the creation of green jobs. It also promotes multidisciplinary cooperation and better mental health for urban inhabitants; (5) Threats: Potential threats include limiting traditional agriculture, nuclear safety risks, resistance to political changes, and uncertainties about the effectiveness of planned interventions. There are also concerns about economic disruptions in high-emission industries and regions.