Erratum

doi:10.5406/26428652.94.2.12

January 1, 2026Utah Historical Quarterly

Erratum

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

To correct a geographical error in a previously published environmental history article.
Review of the original article content and mapping details.
Identification of the incorrect labeling of counties in the watershed map.
Correction of the labeling of Kane County and Iron County in the map.
Ensured accurate representation of geographical features relevant to Southern Utah's irrigation.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Erratum identifies a geographical labeling error in the mapping of Southern Utah's watershed regions.

Abstract

“‘The Majestic Virgin Forgot Her Promise’: An Environmental History of Irrigating Southern Utah, 1849–1910,” Utah Historical Quarterly 92, no. 2 (Spring 2024): 100–122.On page 100, “A map of the Virgin River watershed” mistakenly labels the county east of Washington County as Iron. Kane County is east of Washington County, and Iron County is directly north of it.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

A 2026 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b7a1e7dec685947aa55a https://doi.org/10.5406/26428652.94.2.12

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Erratum

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Erratum

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading