Randomized trial develops a model predicting AKI in cirrhosis, suggesting a tool for earlier intervention.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication in decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Conventional kidney function markers, including serum creatinine (sCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), are often inaccurate in these patients. We aimed to develop a predictive model for AKI using routine admission data. We retrospectively analyzed patients with DC and normal sCr admitted to a local tertiary hospital (Dec 2016-Dec 2022). AKI was defined per International Club of Ascites criteria. Predictors were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and incorporated into a logistic model, internally validated via enhanced bootstrap and externally validated in the MIMIC-III cohort. Model performance was assessed using AUROC, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A user-friendly nomogram was constructed. Of 1,863 patients screened, 1,091 met criteria; 122 (10.8%) developed AKI. AKI patients were older, had longer stays, worse liver function, more complications (hepatic encephalopathy, infections), and higher rates of hypertension (HT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). sCr and eGFR had poor discrimination for AKI. The final model included age, neutrophil count, direct bilirubin, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, DM2, and HT, achieving AUROC 0.755 (internal validation: AUROC 0.733, sensitivity 0.697, specificity 0.626). DCA showed greater clinical benefit than treat-all or treat-none strategies. External validation in 810 MIMIC-III patients yielded AUROC 0.729; bootstrap validation confirmed robustness (AUROC 0.752, sensitivity 0.748, specificity 0.677). We developed and validated a simple admission-based model for predicting AKI in DC, supporting its potential use for risk stratification and early intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: