Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates clustering performance using BRKGA-CE, indicating improved partition quality.
Clustering algorithms are used to partition datasets associated with various real-world applications. However, in addition to the adopted algorithm, the obtained partition depends on the data distribution. Consequently, applying a single algorithm can result in a poor-quality partition. Cluster Ensemble (CE) is an alternative to produce a good quality partition, as it combines different dataset partitions into a single consensus partition. According to the literature, the consensus partition is generally less sensitive to noise when compared to that produced by a single algorithm. This work proposes a CE algorithm (BRKGA-CE) that combines: (i) three different strategies for producing base partitions; (ii) the BRKGA metaheuristic; (iii) the mean silhouette index, and (iv) an iterative method applied in the final phase of BRKGA-CE that allocates each object into a cluster. The core idea of BRKGA-CE is to find the representative objects of each cluster in order to maximize the mean silhouette index. To evaluate BRKGA-CE, computational experiments were carried out using the main algorithms from the literature on 20 datasets, applying two well-known external validation indices (NMI and AR) and performing hypothesis tests. As a result, BRKGA-CE presented good quality solutions in the three strategies compared to the other algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beltrão et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: