Systematic review evaluates serum vitamin D's impact on stroke severity and outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.
Objectives: Vitamin D deficiency is common in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and has been proposed as a potential prognostic factor. However, evidence regarding its association with stroke severity and outcomes remains inconsistent. This review evaluated the association between serum vitamin D levels and neurological severity, functional outcome, and infarct volume in AIS. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for observational studies assessing serum vitamin D in relation to stroke severity measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and infarct volume. Meta-analyses of correlation coefficients were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to stroke onset, geographic region, and vitamin D assay method. Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 (2,242 participants) contributed to the primary meta-analysis. Serum vitamin D levels were moderately and inversely correlated with NIHSS scores at admission (r = −0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.45 to −0.32; I 2 = 65%). Lower vitamin D levels were also associated with worse functional outcomes on the mRS (6 studies, 538 participants; r = −0.43, 95% CI −0.60 to −0.27; I 2 = 83%) and with larger infarct volumes on magnetic resonance imaging (4 studies, 710 participants; r = −0.29, 95% CI −0.41 to −0.16; I 2 = 73%). Subgroup analyses showed consistent inverse associations across stroke onset, geographic region, and assay methods, although substantial heterogeneity remained. Conclusion: Lower serum vitamin D levels are associated with greater neurological severity, poorer functional outcomes, and larger infarct volumes in AIS. However, substantial heterogeneity limits causal inference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arrizqi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: