Demonstrates high accuracy for haplotype phasing in unrelated individuals, suggesting improved genetic research potential.
Motivation Across-chromosome phasing identifies which haplotypes of different chromosomes come from the same parent. This differs from within-chromosome phasing, which uses linkage disequilibrium patterns to determine which alleles were co-inherited within each chromosome but does not match haplotypes across different chromosomes. While across-chromosome phasing can be conducted using genotypes from parents or close relatives, current methods perform poorly for samples of unrelated individuals. Here, we introduce a novel approach for across-chromosome phasing that employs a window-based SNP-similarity metric, eliminating the need for data from close relatives or detection of identical-by-descent haplotypes. Results Using UK Biobank offspring with both parents genotyped as a gold standard, we evaluated the performance of our method by phasing the offspring without using parental data. In genomic data with no within-chromosomal phase errors, our algorithm achieved a mean across-chromosome phasing accuracy of 95%, with 53% of individuals phased perfectly. When data was pre-phased computationally using a standard within-chromosomal phasing algorithm, mean accuracy for across-chromosome phasing dropped to 83.1%. Thus, our method is limited primarily by the accuracy of within-chromosome phasing, and can approach near perfect across-chromosome phasing accuracy as within-chromosome phasing accuracy improves. Availability and Implementation The implementation was executed within a multi-node computational environment of University of Colorado Boulder Research Computing (Blanca Cluster: https://www.colorado.edu/rc/resources/blanca), employing parallelization techniques in the C programming language. The source code has been made publicly accessible online at https://github.com/emmanuelsapin/AcrossChromosomesPhasing, thereby facilitating reproducibility of the results for researchers with authorized access to the UK Biobank dataset. Supplementary Information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sapin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: