Argues for a revised understanding of mental imagery, focusing on modality-invariant properties instead of sensory divisions.
Despite recent attention to multimodal imagery, the field remains dominated by the traditional view that mental imagery is divided by sensory modality. However, growing evidence from neuroscience challenges this view, showing that brain areas traditionally thought to be modality-specific actually process sensory information (e.g. shape, motion, or speech) independently from modality, even in sensory-deprived individuals. This paper argues that the assumption of modality-specificity in mental imagery should be significantly revised, if not abandoned. Instead, it proposes a shift in perspective: mental imagery may be better understood in terms of modality-invariant properties, such as shape or frequency, rather than sensory-based divisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabrizio Calzavarini (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: