Cross-sectional study identifies profiles of life satisfaction, social isolation, and depression among older men, suggesting the need for gender-sensitive interventions.
Purpose This study aims to identify distinct profiles of life satisfaction social isolation depression and loneliness among community-dwelling older men and to examine their associations with sociodemographic characteristics. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional design was used using secondary data from a sample of 175 older men. Data collection encompassed sociodemographic variables alongside validated scales measuring social isolation, life satisfaction, depression and loneliness. Findings Cluster analysis revealed four profiles: mildly satisfied without loneliness (44%), moderately satisfied but lonely (25.1%), highly satisfied (20%) and poorly satisfied and depressed (10.9%). Significant associations emerged between clusters, marital status and living arrangements. Unmarried men and those living alone were more prevalent in the “moderately satisfied but lonely” group. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study underscore the need for further research on loneliness and social isolation in older men, particularly from a gender-sensitive perspective, to inform targeted interventions and support services. Originality/value This study contributes to a deeper understanding of male ageing by identifying four distinct psychosocial profiles among community-dwelling older men. This study highlights the complexity and diversity of factors influencing well-being in this population, dimensions that remain underexplored in the existing literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sousa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: