Background: Workplace-related outbreaks of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) have been increasingly reported among shipyard workers, yet their epidemiological and clinical features remain incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize available evidence on IPD outbreaks in shipyard settings. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and medRxiv was conducted up to March 2026. Observational studies reporting IPD outbreaks in shipyards were included. Pooled incidence rates and clinical outcomes were estimated using random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed by I2 statistics. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Eight studies describing six outbreaks across four European countries (France, Norway, Northern Ireland, Finland; 2015–2025) were included, encompassing 131 cases among 35,623 workers. The pooled incidence was 368.9 cases per 100,000 workers with an attack rate of 2.36 per 1000 person-months for total cases, compared to 200.49 cases per 100,000 workers (95%CI 103.54–387.85) and 1.10 cases per 1000 person-months (95% CI 0.17–2.03) for laboratory confirmed cases, with considerable heterogeneity across studies. Most cases occurred in men (97.7%), with the median age ranging from 39 to 48 years. Hospitalizations occurred in 79.1% of cases, intensive care unit admission in 13.7%, and the case fatality ratio was 0.8%. Serotype 4 accounted for 67.2% of characterized isolates. Occupational exposures and shared accommodation may have contributed to transmission, although this could not be formally assessed. Conclusions: IPD outbreaks in shipyard settings are characterized by high incidence but relatively favorable outcomes, likely reflecting workforce demographics. However, considerable heterogeneity and methodological limitations across studies constrain the interpretation of pooled estimates. Preventive strategies, including vaccination and workplace-targeted interventions, should be considered as plausible public health measures, with a proactive role for occupational health services.
Riccò et al. (Wed,) studied this question.