Critical assessment of five global risk scenarios in Nigeria highlights methodological limitations, suggesting a new framework.
This article subjects five global risk scenarios — drawn from the author’s cascading-risks research program — to a place-based stress test using Nigeria as a critical case. Rather than forecasting Nigeria’s future, the analysis interrogates these scenarios as methodological artifacts: what assumptions about agency, shock propagation, and institutional capacity do they embed, and where do those assumptions fail? Using an evidence-to-scenario protocol adapted from PRISMA-inspired review methodology, scenario claims are linked to auditable empirical anchors across six domains — governance, demography, economy, climate, technology, and migration — and a critical futures rubric is applied to each scenario. The analysis reveals recurring methodological limitations: linear impact narratives, passive-periphery assumptions, and technology-centered causality that systematically under-specify the informal institutions and social cohesion dynamics that drive adaptive capacity in heterogeneous contexts. The contribution is methodological: a replicable framework for interrogating the worldview commitments embedded in globally-oriented scenarios before they are applied across heterogeneous contexts. The article concludes with a constructive proposal for epistemically pluralist scenario design drawing on African futures scholarship and indigenous forecasting traditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trond Arne Undheim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: