Randomized trial investigates how ozone and nitrogen affect soil microbial communities in poplar systems, suggesting important implications for agroforestry.
Litter decomposition regulates the quantity and quality of plant-derived carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) inputs to soil and is closely associated with microbial community structure. However, how elevated ozone (O3) and nitrogen (N) addition interactively affect residual litter inputs and their associations with soil microbial communities remains poorly understood, especially in agroforestry systems. Here, we conducted a 12-month in situ litter decomposition experiment using two poplar clones (107 and 546) under ambient or elevated O3 with or without N addition (60 kg N ha−1 yr−1) at an O3-FACE platform in northern China. Litter mass and chemical traits were measured during decomposition, and endpoint soil microbial community structure was characterized using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiling. Treatment effects and litter–microbe associations were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models, correlation analysis, and redundancy analysis (RDA). Endpoint litter mass remaining was significantly affected by O3, clone identity, and their interactions with N addition, while endpoint litter chemical traits showed trait-specific responses. PLFA-derived microbial community indices also showed treatment- and clone-dependent responses, particularly in bacterial groups, AM fungi, and the fungal-to-bacterial ratio. Endpoint litter mass remaining showed the strongest statistical association with PLFA-derived microbial community structure, whereas individual nutrient concentrations showed weaker independent effects. These findings suggest that O3- and N-induced changes in residual litter quantity and quality are associated with shifts in PLFA-derived microbial community structure. Because PLFA characterizes microbial community structure rather than process rates, these findings should be interpreted as evidence of structural microbial reorganization associated with altered residual litter inputs, rather than direct evidence of changes in C or N cycling rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: