Evaluates causal propagation constraints in scalar-tensor theories, suggesting new diagnostic tools.
We perform an explicit derivation of the principal symbol of the scalar perturbation in a smooth-inhomogeneous quasi-static dust background under the decoupling limit, for scalar-tensor theories with a disformal coupling of the form g̃_μν = A(C) g_μν + B(C) ∂_μC ∂_νC. Working in the eikonal regime and in the local orthonormal frame comoving with the dust, the resulting phase velocity is c_s² = 1/(1−ξ) with ξ ≡ A_0^(3/2) √Z_0 B_0 ρ̃_0 / K_0 evaluated on the background, where Z = A − 2BX and X = −½ g^μν ∂_μC ∂_νC. Within this declared regime, subluminal causal propagation of the scalar mode requires B(C) ≤ 0 in regions with positive dust density. The constraint is sharp, falsifiable, and operationally testable. We discuss the strict validity domain of this result, the operational (non-causal) status of the perturbative regime |ξ| < 1, and the potential tension with disformal parametrizations that adopt B(C) > 0 in regions of phenomenological interest. The result is offered as a diagnostic tool for disformal scalar-tensor models coupled to dust, not as a verdict on any specific construction. We do not claim universality; we claim transparency. The analysis is restricted to: pressureless dust matter, quasi-static backgrounds with ũ^μ ∇_μ C_0 = 0, decoupling limit (δg_μν = 0), perturbative-control regime |ξ| < 1, and strict invertibility Z_0 > 0. Cosmological backgrounds with nonzero Hubble flow, ghost-free conditions, post-Newtonian compatibility, and the fully coupled scalar-tensor analysis lie outside the present scope and are noted as natural extensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arturo Cerezo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: