Explores how leader pro-social rule-breaking affects employees, suggesting the importance of trust and communication.
Purpose Leaders, as rule enforcers and organizational representatives, engage in pro-social rule-breaking behavior (PSRB) that can yield ambiguous outcomes for employees. Based on social learning theory, this study explores the trickle-down effect and its two underlying psychological mechanisms to better understand how leader PSRB affects employee PSRB. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a cross-sectional supervisor-subordinate matched questionnaire, data were collected from 102 leaders and 486 employees from 5 enterprises in China. Findings Results show that leader PSRB positively affects employee PSRB, and leader trust and perceived acceptability of norm violation mediate this relationship. Supervisor-subordinate communication moderates the positive associations between leader PSRB, leader trust, and perceived acceptability of norm violation, and also functions as a moderated mediator. Practical implications To effectively manage the trickle-down effect of PSRB, organizations should enhance leaders' self-awareness of their role-modeling impact, proactively set cognitive boundaries for acceptable norm violations, responsibly foster leader trust, and maintain transparent supervisor-subordinate communication. Originality/value The internal mechanisms driving the trickle-down effect of leader PSRB remain an unresolved theoretical gap. Drawing on social learning theory, this study establishes a dual-pathway framework, demonstrating how employees process leader PSRB through simultaneous affective (leader trust) and cognitive (perceived acceptability) lenses to theoretically explain this downward transmission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: