This article analyzes how self-uncertainty influences group identification and intergroup behaviors, indicating potential positive and negative outcomes.
Uncertainty is part of daily life, and an enduring feature of the wider world we live in. People experience and react to uncertainty in different ways, as a function of their individual preferences and the nature and context of the uncertainty. In this article I describe an uncertainty-identity theory analysis of how feelings of uncertainty, specifically self-uncertainty, shape and drive what we do, what we think, and how we feel, and ultimately affect the world we live in. Identification with distinctive groups with unambiguous and clearly defined social identities is a very effective way to reduce self-related uncertainty, and thus delivers all the benefits of group identification and cohesive groups for individuals, groups and society. However, when people feel they do not have the cognitive, social and material resources to reduce uncertainty then uncertainty is experienced as an overwhelming threat that is to be avoided, rather than sought out as an exhilarating challenge to be easily resolved. Identification to reduce uncertainty experienced as a threat can generate an array of negative outcomes associated with extremism, populism, autocratic leadership, identity echo chambers, suppression of diversity, and so forth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Hogg (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: