Key result
Study lacks clinical data to determine anticoagulation bleeding risk in elderly VTE patients.
Why the study?
Older patients with VTE are underrepresented in clinical anticoagulation trials, leaving the extent of exclusion and the bleeding risk in hypothetically excluded versus enrolled patients unclear.
Does the presence of clinical trial exclusion criteria predict major bleeding in elderly patients with acute VTE?
Does the presence of clinical trial exclusion criteria predict major bleeding in elderly patients with acute VTE?
About one-third of older VTE patients would be excluded from landmark anticoagulation trials, and these patients have a significantly higher risk of major bleeding, limiting the generalizability of trial results.
Trial exclusion criteria were associated with doubled major bleeding risk in elderly VTE; leaves open generalizability of anticoagulation trial results.
Older patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are underrepresented in clinical anticoagulation trials. We examined to which extent elderly patients with VTE would be excluded from such trials and compared the bleeding risk between hypothetically excluded and enrolled patients. We studied 991 patients aged ≥65 years with acute VTE in a prospective multicenter cohort. We identified 12 landmark VTE oral anticoagulation trials from the eighth and updated ninth American College of Chest Physician Guidelines. For each trial, we abstracted the exclusion criteria and calculated the proportion of our study patients who would have been excluded from trial participation. We examined the association between five common exclusion criteria (hemodynamic instability, high bleeding risk, comorbidity, co-medication, and invasive treatments) and major bleeding (MB) within 36 months using competing risk regression, adjusting for age, sex, and periods of anticoagulation. A median of 31% (range: 20-52%) of our patients would have been excluded from participation in the landmark trials. Hemodynamic instability (sub-hazard ratio [SHR]: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1-4.7), comorbidity (SHR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2), and co-medication (SHR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.3) were associated with MB. Compared to eligible patients, those with ≥2 exclusion criteria had a twofold (SHR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.38-3.39) increased risk of MB. Overall, about one-third of older patients would not be eligible for participation in guideline-defining VTE anticoagulation trials. The bleeding risk increases significantly with the number of exclusion criteria present. Thus, results from such trials may not be generalizable to older, multimorbid, and co-medicated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schenker et al. (2023) studied Venous Thromboembolism. Anticoagulation was evaluated on Bleeding Risk. No clinical study data was provided in the text to determine the bleeding risk of anticoagulation in elderly patients with venous thromboembolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: