Key result
Clinical bleeding risk scores poorly predict major bleeding in elderly VTE patients during extended anticoagulation.
Why the study?
In elderly patients with VTE, the decision to extend anticoagulation beyond 3 months must be weighed against bleeding risk, requiring evaluation of clinical bleeding risk scores.
Cohort (n=743)
Yes
Existing clinical bleeding risk scores have poor to fair predictive performance and are insufficient to reliably identify elderly VTE patients at high risk of bleeding during extended anticoagulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bleeding risk scores lack reliability for elderly VTE patients on extended anticoagulation; should not yet change practice and leaves open need for improved models.
Background In elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), the decision to extend anticoagulation beyond 3 months must be weighed against the bleeding risk. We compared the predictive performance of 10 clinical bleeding scores (VTE-BLEED, Seiler, Kuijer, Kearon, RIETE, ACCP, OBRI, HEMORR2HAGES, HAS-BLED, ATRIA) in elderly patients receiving extended anticoagulation for VTE. Methods In a multicenter Swiss cohort study, we analyzed 743 patients aged ≥65 years who received extended treatment with vitamin K antagonists after VTE. The outcomes were the time to a first major and clinically relevant bleeding. For each score, we classified patients into two bleeding risk categories (low/moderate vs. high). We calculated likelihood ratios and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for each score. Results Over a median anticoagulation duration of 10.1 months, 45 patients (6.1%) had a first major and 127 (17.1%) a clinically relevant bleeding. The positive likelihood ratios for predicting major bleeding ranged from 0.69 (OBRI) to 2.56 (Seiler) and from 1.07 (ACCP) to 2.36 (Seiler) for clinically relevant bleeding. The areas under the ROC curves were poor to fair and varied between 0.47 (OBRI) and 0.70 (Seiler) for major and between 0.52 (OBRI) and 0.67 (HEMORR2HAGES) for clinically relevant bleeding. Conclusion The predictive performance of most clinical bleeding risk scores does not appear to be sufficiently high to identify elderly patients with VTE who are at high risk of bleeding and who may therefore not be suitable candidates for extended anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frei et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism (n=743). Clinical bleeding risk scores was evaluated on Time to a first major and clinically relevant bleeding. Ten clinical bleeding risk scores showed poor to fair predictive performance for identifying elderly VTE patients at high risk during extended anticoagulation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: