Why the study?
Bleeding is the most concerning complication of anticoagulant therapy but is poorly characterized, highlighting the need for a risk stratification score to predict VKA-associated bleeding in VTE.
What are the predictors of significant bleeding in outpatients receiving initial vitamin K antagonist treatment for first venous thromboembolism?
What are the predictors of significant bleeding in outpatients receiving initial vitamin K antagonist treatment for first venous thromboembolism?
A newly developed risk score using clinical predictors can identify VTE outpatients at high risk of significant bleeding during initial VKA therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support bleeding risk stratification in VTE outpatients on VKA; leaves open external validation before clinical use.
Bleeding is the most concerning complication associated with anticoagulant therapy but poorly characterized and important for risk/benefit assessment. We developed a risk stratification score to predict vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-associated bleeding in venous thromboembolism (VTE) using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Significant bleeding events in outpatients consisted of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding requiring hospitalisation (CRNMB-H) within 90 days of VKA initiation. A scoring scheme for predicting bleeding was developed from subhazard ratios, validated using cross-validation and expressed by the C-statistic. The study cohort consisted of 10,010 patients with first VTE receiving initial VKA treatment, mean age 62·2 years. Between 2008 and 2016, 167 significant bleeding events were recorded (1·7%), i.e. incidence rate was 7·4/100 person-years. Independent predictors for community-acquired significant bleeding included active cancer, trauma/surgical procedure, male gender, dementia, liver disease, anaemia, history of bleeding, cerebrovascular, renal and chronic pulmonary disease, VTE presenting as pulmonary embolism and age over 75. The overall C-statistic was 0·68 (95% CI, 0·60-0·76), 0·75 (0·60-0·88) for major bleeding and 0·65 (0·55-0·75) for CRNMB-H, and higher than in other risk schemes applied to our study population. The developed risk score may identify patients having a significant bleeding risk, in particular major bleeding events, in outpatients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: