Key result
More frequent achievement of a blood pressure target of <140/90 mm Hg reduced the risk of cardiovascular events, whereas a tighter target of <130/80 mm Hg did not increase overall cardiac protection.
Why the study?
Does more frequent achievement of guideline-recommended blood pressure targets (<140/90 or <130/80 mm Hg) reduce cardiovascular and renal events in high-cardiovascular-risk patients?
RCT
Yes
Does more frequent achievement of guideline-recommended blood pressure targets (<140/90 or <130/80 mm Hg) reduce cardiovascular and renal events in high-cardiovascular-risk patients?
Achieving a standard blood pressure target (<140/90 mm Hg) favorably affected overall cardiovascular protection, whereas a tighter target (<130/80 mm Hg) provided cerebrovascular and renal benefits without additional overall cardiovascular protection.
May support <140/90 mm Hg targets in high-risk patients; leaves open whether tighter control adds cardiovascular benefit.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension treatment guidelines recommend that blood pressure (BP) be lowered to <140/90 mm Hg, but that a reduction to <130/80 mm Hg be adopted in patients at high cardiovascular (CV) risk. We investigated the CV and renal benefits associated with these BP targets in the high-CV-risk population of the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination With Ramipril Global End Point Trial (ONTARGET). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the proportion of in-treatment visits before the occurrence of an event (<25%->75%) in which BP was reduced to <140/90 or <130/80 mm Hg. After adjustment for demographic and clinical variables, a progressive increase in the proportion of visits in which BP was reduced to <140/90 or <130/80 mm Hg was associated with a progressive reduction in the risk of stroke, new onset of microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria, and return to normoalbuminuria in albuminuric patients. An increased frequency of BP control to either target did not have any consistent effect on the adjusted risk of myocardial infarction and heart failure. The adjusted risk of CV events was reduced by increasing the frequency of BP control to <140/90 mm Hg, but not to <130/80 mm Hg. Similar findings were obtained for the achievement of the BP target in the visit preceding a CV event. CONCLUSION: The more frequent achievement of the BP targets recommended by guidelines led to cerebrovascular and renal protection, but did not increase cardiac protection. Overall, CV protection was favorably affected by the less tight but not by the tighter BP target. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00153101.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mancia et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in High cardiovascular risk. Blood pressure target <130/80 mm Hg vs. Blood pressure target <140/90 mm Hg was evaluated on Cardiovascular and renal events. More frequent achievement of a blood pressure target of <140/90 mm Hg reduced the risk of cardiovascular events, whereas a tighter target of <130/80 mm Hg did not increase overall cardiac protection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: